Skip to content
KRASTOR

Services · Systems Consolidation

Sometimes the fix isn't another tool. It's killing five of them.

The average company runs 130 SaaS apps and uses a fraction of what it pays for. We audit the sprawl, then replace, eliminate, and consolidate, building custom only where off-the-shelf genuinely fails. Less surface area, lower cost, one architecture. Whether you run a dozen tools or a hundred, if some overlap and some quietly cost you, this is where we look.

What's included

The consolidation work, named.

Every component from the audit through the cutover. Consolidation doesn't end when the tools are chosen. It ends when the data is clean, the subscriptions are cancelled, and the team is running one architecture.

01

Tool & SaaS Audit

Every tool you run, every seat you pay for, and every overlap mapped in one inventory. Most organizations don't know what they're running until they see it all in one place.
02

Software Rationalization

The keep / replace / eliminate decision for every tool, with the cost math, the capability gap analysis, and a clear recommendation for each. Not a suggestion list. A decision map.
03

Consolidation onto One Architecture

Replace the survivors' siloed data with a unified data model. One source of truth, one integration surface, one architecture everything plugs into going forward.
04

Custom Builds Where Off-the-Shelf Can't Fit

Some gaps genuinely require a custom build. We build only where nothing off-the-shelf fits, and we're honest when something off-the-shelf is the right answer.
05

Data Migration & Integrity

Everything in the tools you're killing gets moved cleanly. Data integrity is non-negotiable: migration is part of the engagement, not an afterthought.
06

Contract & Cost Takeout

Kill the subscriptions you don't need. We identify contracts with near-term renewal dates, negotiate exits where possible, and remove recurring cost that isn't earning its keep.
07

Integration of Survivors into One Source of Truth

The tools you keep get connected: bi-directional sync, unified data model, no more copy-paste between systems.
08

Change Management for the Cutover

The humans running the old tools need to know how the new ones work. We manage the transition so nothing breaks and no one is left on a tool that's been turned off.
09

License & Seat Audit

Every paid seat across every tool accounted for: who's active, who hasn't logged in for 90 days, and which seats are provisioned to roles that no longer exist.
10

Redundancy Mapping

Capabilities that exist in two or more tools identified and mapped, so the keep/replace decision is made with a complete picture of what each tool actually does for which team.
11

Single-Sign-On Consolidation

Authentication rationalized to a single identity provider, so access provisioning and de-provisioning happen once, in one place, with a complete audit trail.
12

Integration Rationalization

Every point-to-point integration between tools inventoried, and the integration architecture redesigned around the consolidated stack, so retired tools don't leave broken connections behind.
13

Vendor-Contract Renegotiation

Near-term renewals identified and negotiated from an informed position, with actual usage data, the consolidated tool map, and a clear picture of what leverage exists at renewal time.
14

Decommissioning & Change Management

A structured shutdown sequence for each retired tool: data extracted, users migrated, contracts terminated, and the organization moved to the replacement without productivity loss.
15

Post-Acquisition Integration

When two companies combine, the first six months are a systems war. We run the integration playbook: consolidate the CRMs, unify reporting, migrate data, kill duplicate software, and build the combined operating layer.

How it works

Inventory, rationalize, consolidate.

Three stages. Each one is a decision gate: you see the full picture before any tool is killed or any build is started. No surprises, no forced migrations.

Step 1

Inventory

Every tool, every seat, every dollar. Most organizations haven't seen their full stack in one view. This is the map. It's the deliverable that makes the rationalization possible.

Step 2

Rationalize

The keep / replace / eliminate decision for every tool, with the cost math. We run the analysis; you make the call. Nothing is deprecated without a clear recommendation and your sign-off.

Step 3

Consolidate

Migrate the data, integrate the survivors, shut the rest off cleanly. Change management included: the team runs the new architecture from day one.

In practice

A 1.5% fee replaced by a custom flow and a lower-cost processor.

Context-switching across 130 apps costs the US economy an estimated $450 billion per year. The average knowledge worker loses roughly 200 hours annually just switching between tools, time that compounds into missed deadlines, duplicated data, and work that falls through the gaps between systems.

What this looks like in practice: a client-management tool charging a 1.5% transaction fee gets replaced with a low-cost ACH processor and a custom client-management flow built for the actual process, not a generic one. The fee disappears. The workflow gets tighter. The surface area shrinks.

130
Average SaaS apps per company, a fraction of them actively used
Industry benchmark
~200 hrs
Lost per worker per year to tool-switching. Time your team doesn't have.
Industry benchmark
Less surface
Area: fewer tools means fewer integration failures, fewer security vectors, fewer licenses
Fewer tools
One audit typically retires or consolidates a meaningful share of overlapping SaaS, with the savings redirected into the build

Pricing logic

Priced on value, never on hours.

Often pays for itself in eliminated subscriptions within months. Scoped to the size of the stack and the depth of the migration work.

SaaS audit + rationalization map

Full stack inventory, keep/replace/eliminate decision map with cost math, and a phased consolidation sequence. Credited toward the build if you proceed. Exact numbers are sized to your operation and put in writing before you commit.

Scoped in the diagnostic

Consolidation build / migration

Scoped by the number of tools migrated, the complexity of the data migration, and the depth of the custom build required. Often recovers its cost in year-one subscription cancellations.

Fixed for the build

Questions

Straight answers.

Will you just tell us to buy more software?

The opposite. Our bias is to eliminate and consolidate. Every tool we recommend keeping has to justify itself against the custom alternative or the cheaper replacement. We build custom only where nothing off-the-shelf fits, and we say so plainly when off-the-shelf is the better answer.

What about the data in the tools we kill?

Migration and integrity are part of every consolidation engagement. Nothing is lost. Every record in every deprecated tool is either migrated to the surviving architecture or archived with a clear retrieval path.

How is this different from Token Governance?

Token Governance cuts AI spend: the cost of the models and workflows running in your stack. Consolidation cuts tool sprawl: the SaaS subscriptions, the duplicate capabilities, and the integration complexity. Together they strip cost and complexity out of the whole stack.

Engagement starts here

Paying for software you don't use?

Thirty minutes. We map your operation, name what's actually slowing it down, and tell you what we'd do if we were running it. You get a written stack assessment after the call, whether you hire us or not.

Not limited to what's listed. Every engagement starts by assessing what your business actually needs, and we build whatever it requires.